AI images - does this make any difference to charges/outcome?
Notifications OFF
Hi there
I've tried to search for posts from others about this but the search function pulls up every word that contains the letters AI (chair, fair etc) so it's not been helpful.
In my situation, my person was initially found to have mostly AI IIOC, with one real but commercial image. All are likely Cat C. There's a chance more evidence may be found by forensics but that's the current situation.
I'd be interested in hearing if anyone else's situation involved AI images and whether this affected charges or outcome differently? (As opposed to real images)
Thank you
I've tried to search for posts from others about this but the search function pulls up every word that contains the letters AI (chair, fair etc) so it's not been helpful.
In my situation, my person was initially found to have mostly AI IIOC, with one real but commercial image. All are likely Cat C. There's a chance more evidence may be found by forensics but that's the current situation.
I'd be interested in hearing if anyone else's situation involved AI images and whether this affected charges or outcome differently? (As opposed to real images)
Thank you
We were told that AI images were treated the same as 'real' images - in the same way that a police decoy is treated the same as real child for sentencing purposes.
In our case the 2 image charges were worded so it covered both AI (psuedo) images and real images.
In our case the 2 image charges were worded so it covered both AI (psuedo) images and real images.