Shpo and sex offenders
Notifications OFF
Hi do these shopo and sor
Stop you going to the beach and doing the normal things boat rides playing arcades etc
Other half still in prison but want a day at seaside when he's out to just hear the waves and eat donuts
Can we do this
Stop you going to the beach and doing the normal things boat rides playing arcades etc
Other half still in prison but want a day at seaside when he's out to just hear the waves and eat donuts
Can we do this
Hi,
you would have to check on his SHPO if there are any places named that he can't go. Usually SHPOs still allow for a normal life and only restrict deleting internet history and contact with under 18s. If it is a contact offence or he is deemed high risk there may be a clause on there stating that he cannot go to areas where children would congregate. I would read through the terms of his SHPO to check before going and maybe choose a day that will be quieter at the beach xxx
you would have to check on his SHPO if there are any places named that he can't go. Usually SHPOs still allow for a normal life and only restrict deleting internet history and contact with under 18s. If it is a contact offence or he is deemed high risk there may be a clause on there stating that he cannot go to areas where children would congregate. I would read through the terms of his SHPO to check before going and maybe choose a day that will be quieter at the beach xxx
My person wasn't allowed in play parks etc where there would be children
Thankyou all he's still in prison at the minute his was internet based we not even got his license conditions etc yet I know his due out in march 2027 , but might get the 33%
Things are so so slow thanks all xx
Things are so so slow thanks all xx
Post deleted by user
Hi lovely even tho you was with him supervising him a d he wasn't alone with the children this his so do wrong
Was your husband in prison as well xx
Was your husband in prison as well xx
6789 does someone report him for being at the event/in these places?
6789 that sounds ridiculously harsh. To be told to go and stand in front of CCTV to prove your not in contact with a child. . What if he's on a bus or train and a child gets on? Must he get off at the next stop and then await the next train/bus and have to pay for a new ticket? Or maybe leave the train platform if children become present.
What if he's in a supermarket or shopping centre and a child enters and walks nearby? Is he then disallowed from buying food or new clothing? I'd be contacting a solicitor over rules like those, especially if they're not mentioned in the SOR.
What if he's in a supermarket or shopping centre and a child enters and walks nearby? Is he then disallowed from buying food or new clothing? I'd be contacting a solicitor over rules like those, especially if they're not mentioned in the SOR.
I think it comes down to what's in the SHPO, whether the person is deemed low, medium or high risk and how the offender manager works.
My son SHPO restriction prevents him from having unsupervised contact with anyone under 18 years unless agreed otherwise by SS and the parent. But he has no restrictions where he goes and can take his children to the park, to the beach, to the swimming pool etc.
My son SHPO restriction prevents him from having unsupervised contact with anyone under 18 years unless agreed otherwise by SS and the parent. But he has no restrictions where he goes and can take his children to the park, to the beach, to the swimming pool etc.
Post deleted by user
Even the most restrictive SHPOs usually have some wording about no unsupervised contact, "except that which is unavoidable in normal daily life."
It is not intended to stop people from going to the shops or the beach, or anywhere else. Unfortunately there are some offender managers who choose to interpret it as widely as possible and this is how we end up with many of the horror stories about excessive restrictions.
However, it is important to remember that the police do have very extensive powers of disclosure. So although they cannot legally stop someone going somewhere, they could, in theory, disclose that persons convictions to a gym owner, or to a swimming pool for example.
In practice, the worst ones will use the threat of disclosure to deter people from doing things and many will decide it is not worth the risk of possible disclosure.
It is not intended to stop people from going to the shops or the beach, or anywhere else. Unfortunately there are some offender managers who choose to interpret it as widely as possible and this is how we end up with many of the horror stories about excessive restrictions.
However, it is important to remember that the police do have very extensive powers of disclosure. So although they cannot legally stop someone going somewhere, they could, in theory, disclose that persons convictions to a gym owner, or to a swimming pool for example.
In practice, the worst ones will use the threat of disclosure to deter people from doing things and many will decide it is not worth the risk of possible disclosure.
Post deleted by user
