Family and Friends Forum

ScaredLamb

Member since
May 2021

199 posts

Posted Mon May 23, 2022 7:46pmReport post

Hi all

My hubby has pleaded guilty to 4 charges. 2x communication and 2x attempting to engage in the presence of a child charged (video calls).



We have now seen the draft SHPO. It's internet restrictions which is fine abs also "no supervised acsess to a child under 16 apart from in daily life without their parent guardian permission and knowing about the offences and no unsupervised acsess to a child under 16 without parent/guardian permission and SS written permission".



im Gutted about this clause. This means my daughter isn't going to be able to have friends round, birthday parties ect ect.



The barrister doesn't think it would apply to our daughter anyway but we will be asking to have it in writing that jr doesn't apply as I'm scared SS would run with that and never allow him unsupervised. But I really want this clause removed. What do you think the chances are getting the barrister to fight to have it removed in court at time of sentencing? Or do we wait a few years until it actually becomes an issue (daughter only 8 months at the moment!) and then go back to court to see if we can change it?



Has anyone had any luck getting this taken off?

Polly Pocket

Member since
May 2022

440 posts

Posted Mon May 23, 2022 8:29pmReport post

Post deleted by user


Edited Mon May 23, 2022 9:49pm