Family and Friends Forum

What’s going to happen….?

Notifications OFF

AH68

Member since
December 2024

1 post

Posted Wed January 22, 2025 9:32amReport post

I'm terrified for my friend who got The Knock in April 2024. 4 IIOC were found on his phone (cat b, cat c and prohibited) and some horrendous internet searches were detected by police.
My friend is autistic and very trusting of others (far too trusting) which has resulted in him being targeted by so-called friends in the past who have stolen money from him.
My friend is very sociable and generous, and has people sofa-surfing at his flat frequently. His phone is always unlocked and available for anyone in the flat to use to play music.
He is not responsible for the internet searches or the IIOC and has a screenshot of a text conversation between himself and his flatmate on the date of the download of one of the images which clearly shows he was going to take a nap while his friend was over.
The case is currently with the CPS for them to decide whether or not to charge. His solicitor has said she thinks he will be charged.
My question is, in your experience, if he is charged, will the police contact his employer to inform them? He works in a pub. Most staff are over 18 but occasionally the pub employs kitchen staff who are under 18. The pub is very family-friendly. I wish I could reassure him that he's not going to lose his job but I just don't know.
This situation is horrendous and ongoing. Having read several posts, I really do feel for you all.

edel2020

Member since
March 2022

424 posts

Posted Thu January 23, 2025 11:16amReport post

Its unlikely the police would contact his employer at this stage because he is not in a job that is classed as working with children.

If he were to be convicted, then that would be different.

DeepBluOcean

Member since
December 2024

5 posts

Posted Thu January 23, 2025 6:11pmReport post

Hi edel,

would this not be in violation of the "no unsupervised access to under 18s" rule?



surely if the person was arrested for this the police would have to inform their employer for this type of role? Our person quit their bar job a few days before their self disclosure as they assumed the police would tell their employer and word would spread . Thanks x

(they worked alongside under 18 kitchen porters)

Edited Thu January 23, 2025 7:25pm

edel2020

Member since
March 2022

424 posts

Posted Fri January 24, 2025 10:43amReport post

There are certain bail conditions that do not allow unsupervised contact with under 18s. If he is currently on bail, then check those.

If he is not on bail then he has no restrictions on contact with under 18s. The police are allowed to inform employers if they think there is a risk, but they dont generally do that unless it is a job working with children.

LittleRobin3

Member since
April 2024

416 posts

Posted Fri January 24, 2025 11:14amReport post

Hi, firstly, I'm sorry. Then, I suspect that if he has a contract of employment, within it, it will say that he needs to disclose any criminal convictions, even if they happen after he was employed. If he's convicted, he may well be put on the sex offenders register and might be subject to a sexual harm prevention order where there will be certain conditions attached that he must adhere to, usually that includes no contact with anyone under the age of 18. Also regarding his employment, there's a chance that if he's convicted, the case MIGHT end up in the press and/or posted on Police social media. So he'd run the risk of his employers finding out. My son is Autistic and I'm so sorry this is happening. It seems very unfair.