What's the worst I can expect
Notifications OFF
How likely is it for someone to become a target of violence after their personal information is made public?
How much can police protect people in these situations?
How much can police protect people in these situations?
It depends what information is disclosed. Usually it is the name of the person and the road they live on, but not the house number. Sometimes the police may publish a photo.
If it involved a vigilante sting, then there might be more online, but realistically most people are not seeking out this information. The most likely source of info is neighbours gossiping. If they saw something or one of them read about it, then they might share the details.
The police are usually pretty good at taking action if someone is being harassed. They will issue warnings and they would take action if things escalated. But most of the things we read about on here are very low level. Violence is extremely rare.
If it involved a vigilante sting, then there might be more online, but realistically most people are not seeking out this information. The most likely source of info is neighbours gossiping. If they saw something or one of them read about it, then they might share the details.
The police are usually pretty good at taking action if someone is being harassed. They will issue warnings and they would take action if things escalated. But most of the things we read about on here are very low level. Violence is extremely rare.
I live in a v small place so once it hit the press and social media all the neighbours knew.
Some don't speak to me, my property was graffitied and I've been burgled - by a neighbour.
I've stayed. Stuck 2 fingers up - but it's been hard.
But my house goes on the market this week and I'm moving to a nearby town. A bit in anonymity and a fresh start.
Some don't speak to me, my property was graffitied and I've been burgled - by a neighbour.
I've stayed. Stuck 2 fingers up - but it's been hard.
But my house goes on the market this week and I'm moving to a nearby town. A bit in anonymity and a fresh start.
Hi, I can't really answer your question about violence but I suspect alot of that comes down to the area you live in. You can ask the Police, the OIC of the case to put a "marker" on your property. This means that if you encounter any problems and phone them, they'll know why and should come out to you as an emergency. X
If personal information is shared widely, there is a potential risk of violence.
We had no trouble whatsoever and that was with FULL media coverage, full name & street printed etc.
You can prevent media coverage if the crime was online "only".
Little Robin, how is that possible ?
Smile through tears, did many people see it?
Winnie07
My ex has just been sent to prison for the second time for possession of all grades.
About 2 months before sentencing, I emailed the court asking for reporting restrictions. They asked me for details which I sent. Then the day before, the OIC phoned me to ask if I wanted to make an official statement as to why I was requesting reporting restrictions which I did. He said it would be sent to the Judge. Then on the day of sentencing, the CPS prosecutor phoned to explain that the case would be adjourned and an application to the court would be necessary in order to apply for reporting restrictions. However, he said that it would be pointless because although my son and I are vulnerable, we are both over 18 so the Judge wouldn't allow it. He said that the Judge would read my statement though and he would be asked to omit my ex's address from proceedings because his crimes were online only, meaning his address was irrelevant. The Judge did read my statement and the argument was put forward that the address shouldn't be mentioned. The Judge agreed, due to it being irrelevant to the crime and because of our vulnerabilities. Anything spoken about in court can be reported. So in the end, his address was not mentioned. Therefore, the local press and police social media didn't pick it up due to the address not being mentioned. The first time it was mentioned, along with every other detail including his photo which was then picked up by the local police fb page and the local press who therefore reported it. So, it can be done. However, the case could still be reported but it's much much less likely to end up locally. I live in the same town as he did prior to going to prison. I was desperate to stop it being reported.
My ex has just been sent to prison for the second time for possession of all grades.
About 2 months before sentencing, I emailed the court asking for reporting restrictions. They asked me for details which I sent. Then the day before, the OIC phoned me to ask if I wanted to make an official statement as to why I was requesting reporting restrictions which I did. He said it would be sent to the Judge. Then on the day of sentencing, the CPS prosecutor phoned to explain that the case would be adjourned and an application to the court would be necessary in order to apply for reporting restrictions. However, he said that it would be pointless because although my son and I are vulnerable, we are both over 18 so the Judge wouldn't allow it. He said that the Judge would read my statement though and he would be asked to omit my ex's address from proceedings because his crimes were online only, meaning his address was irrelevant. The Judge did read my statement and the argument was put forward that the address shouldn't be mentioned. The Judge agreed, due to it being irrelevant to the crime and because of our vulnerabilities. Anything spoken about in court can be reported. So in the end, his address was not mentioned. Therefore, the local press and police social media didn't pick it up due to the address not being mentioned. The first time it was mentioned, along with every other detail including his photo which was then picked up by the local police fb page and the local press who therefore reported it. So, it can be done. However, the case could still be reported but it's much much less likely to end up locally. I live in the same town as he did prior to going to prison. I was desperate to stop it being reported.
My person was reported in 2 local papers and one of their Facebook pages at 1st court appearance. I've had no comeback but in court it did say he's lost his marriage home etc so If they figure out the link they'll understand we're not together. Ive told close friends we've split up but not why, my closest family know. I've only had 1 person I know see it and say something to me. Everyone has been massively supportive. The police have said actual violence and damage is very rare and usually where the partner has remained in the family home.
I'm terrified to supervise in public now though in case anything is said in front of our child. So far it's not happened. I'm also worried someone from his work finds out and he's sacked for some loophole clause in policy and the financial impact. If it does come out wider I am prepared and will remind people there's a child involved and unfortunately I'm stuck in a no win situation and just trying to do the best I can with what is safe/allowed and remind them that as upset or angry they may be, imagine how the family feel. We didn't know, didn't ask for or want this and gossip won't make anything better for anyone.
I'm terrified to supervise in public now though in case anything is said in front of our child. So far it's not happened. I'm also worried someone from his work finds out and he's sacked for some loophole clause in policy and the financial impact. If it does come out wider I am prepared and will remind people there's a child involved and unfortunately I'm stuck in a no win situation and just trying to do the best I can with what is safe/allowed and remind them that as upset or angry they may be, imagine how the family feel. We didn't know, didn't ask for or want this and gossip won't make anything better for anyone.
Confused 18 - I think people must have read/heard about my sons case. Plus it was on local radio.
We were told internet based crimes are allowed to be reported via the media because 'it's a matter of public information/interest'.
We were told internet based crimes are allowed to be reported via the media because 'it's a matter of public information/interest'.
Smile through tears
at least we now know that it can be avoided at a local level.
at least we now know that it can be avoided at a local level.
Holdingthegrenade, is it likely that your person will experience violence? I'm skeptical about the claim that violence is rare.