Breach ??
Notifications OFF
So my husband was with one police officer then due to moving counties (his parents house is a different county to our actual house) he is now with a different police officer, his original officer gave him permission to destroy a damaged phone (he has email proof of him asking and he's like oh yeah I'll check it then you can chuck it away)
now he's been arrested and faces trial for breach from the police he's with now as they said he weren't allowed to get rid of it, he was given permission, and his old officer is denying everything he said
this is shocking, we're working with social to get him home and we're so scared this has destroyed everything and he'll get put away
how can police be so corrupt?? Surely he can win this one? He's been bailed to his parents house for 6 weeks at least until court, he can't travel far for work and he's a driver, he can't stay with me or anything....thought this was getting better, we're about to have this PLO meeting and don't want them turning on me, I've seen the evidence he's done nothing wrong, he's such a broken man :(
now he's been arrested and faces trial for breach from the police he's with now as they said he weren't allowed to get rid of it, he was given permission, and his old officer is denying everything he said
this is shocking, we're working with social to get him home and we're so scared this has destroyed everything and he'll get put away
how can police be so corrupt?? Surely he can win this one? He's been bailed to his parents house for 6 weeks at least until court, he can't travel far for work and he's a driver, he can't stay with me or anything....thought this was getting better, we're about to have this PLO meeting and don't want them turning on me, I've seen the evidence he's done nothing wrong, he's such a broken man :(
Assuming he was subject to an SHPO, it will depend on the exact wording.
They do not normally contain a provision on destroying devices. The wording is about not deleting the persons internet history and making the device available when the police want to see it.
It seems unlikely that a prosecution could succeed, if there are emails from the officer confirming what he said.
They do not normally contain a provision on destroying devices. The wording is about not deleting the persons internet history and making the device available when the police want to see it.
It seems unlikely that a prosecution could succeed, if there are emails from the officer confirming what he said.
Hi, my son has quite possibly the longest list of requirements on his SHPO and yes one is that he can not sell or destroy a confirmed device without their consent. It makes sense too.
We are currently going through a similar situation! He is not allowed to use instant messaging. We stupidly, as did most people including a number of police officers we have spoken to, did not realise this meant iMessages! The iPhone we have "now" been told should have been switched to only send SMS texts!
We are currently going through a similar situation! He is not allowed to use instant messaging. We stupidly, as did most people including a number of police officers we have spoken to, did not realise this meant iMessages! The iPhone we have "now" been told should have been switched to only send SMS texts!