Search Results
BaffledB
RE: What now?
Are you based in England? It doesn't sound the same as the court system here. The judge shouldn't assume, it's guilty beyond reasonable doubt and the solicitor/barrister should've put forward in the defence statement prior to court that he denied use of the Kik account and this should've raised questions and ...
cooper96
RE: What now?
Thank you BaffledB.
this is my thought too but the solicitor said that because he admitted to the account being his for the one message then the judge would have considered the inconclusive to negative report but aired on the side of caution.
this was a closed court and there was no ...
this is my thought too but the solicitor said that because he admitted to the account being his for the one message then the judge would have considered the inconclusive to negative report but aired on the side of caution.
this was a closed court and there was no ...
BaffledB
RE: What now?
Replying "that's hot" to an image being sent to you isn't a crime - I highly doubt it would be even if you KNEW a minor had sent it to be honest with no further comms.
I would go back to the initial solicitors for a full investigation but if he didn't ...
I would go back to the initial solicitors for a full investigation but if he didn't ...
cooper96
RE: What now?
HelpMe:
it says on the CPS File that it was a law enforcement officer.
the image that he replied 'that's hot' to was on Snapchat.
I don't understand how that is really sexual communication and when the rest of the conversation was on Kik and they have said there's no trace of this ...
it says on the CPS File that it was a law enforcement officer.
the image that he replied 'that's hot' to was on Snapchat.
I don't understand how that is really sexual communication and when the rest of the conversation was on Kik and they have said there's no trace of this ...
RIG22
RE: CPS
Distressed and pregnant; thank you. After the arrest he was assessed by a nurse because they were worried about his state of mind. He wasn't able to speak. When the duty solicitor arrived he advised to go "no comment" for everything. OH wanted to answer but was told not. He was ...
cooper96
RE: What now?
I know. I thought this would bring more clarity but it hasn't.
The CPS file says that there is no evidence of Kik on the phone or the main sexual conversation. It says inconclusive to negative.
He has admitted to the second conversation and sending one message after the pictures of ...
The CPS file says that there is no evidence of Kik on the phone or the main sexual conversation. It says inconclusive to negative.
He has admitted to the second conversation and sending one message after the pictures of ...
BaffledB
RE: What now?
You can call yourself anything you want on Kik and most people purposely do use different names but the rest of it sounds very weird, if he pleaded guilty by his own accord due to poor advice and scaremongering then I doubt the judge will have paid much mind to all ...
cooper96
RE: What now?
I've seen the CPS case file today and it does support what he has told me. The account on kik had a different sir name. The police did send an image which my now ex partner had admitted to sending one reply and this all matches what I've read in the ...
BaffledB
RE: What now?
It can be very difficult to prove a Kik account belongs to someone - it's usually when live pictures (which are taken within the app) are sent or going across to another platform which helps build a case against someone along with other bits of information. Once Kik is deleted the ...
majestictopaz
RE: The saying: 3 clicks away from something illegal
Somewhere on this forum is a thread about a gov article (I think) that delves into this phrase of three clicks but my understanding is that of some wants to do find iioc it can be done more easily than you would think. But it is very rare to come across ...
Page: First ... 21 22 23 24 25 ... Last